15 domains · Direction and subject

CAP AI Capability, Service Outcome and Demand Management

6 families and 24 controls. Critical to CG-01 Capability and outcome definition, CG-02 Boundary and architecture integrity, CG-13 Responsibility and authority, CG-14 Change control.

CAP domain guideSee it in the explorer

Proposed text. Requirements are from registry v1.1 (status CANDIDATE), proposed under amendment AMD-002. Intervals and thresholds are set by the assessed organisation in its capability profile. The approved v1.0 baseline uses the same identifiers.

24 controls

CAP-01 Capability inventory

MCF-CAP-001 Capability Register

Claim implementationAssurance level AL3Tier CP-2Evidence floor S3Critical to CG-01

Objective. Maintain an authoritative register of AI Capability Instances (for example a named training cluster, an inference service pool, a sovereign AI hall) so that every assurance claim is anchored to an identified, bounded instance rather than to a site or product.

Requirement and evidence

The capability owner shall maintain a capability register in which each Capability Instance has a unique identifier, a description of the AI work it delivers (training, fine-tuning, inference, data preparation), its physical and logical location (site, hall, pods, clusters), its tenancy model, its lifecycle status, its accountable owner, its Service Outcomes and its current ArchitectureSnapshot reference. The capability owner shall reconcile the register to the scheduler or orchestration inventory and to the facility asset register at no more than the register reconciliation interval and after every material change.

Evidence required: E1 Documentary and declarative; E2 Configuration and technical state; E7 Derived and analytical. Optional: E6. Operating states: NORMAL.

MCF-CAP-002 Capability Ownership

Claim implementationAssurance level AL3Tier CP-2Evidence floor S3Critical to CG-13Supports CG-01

Objective. Ensure that each Capability Instance has one accountable owner who owns its Service Outcomes, tolerances, risks and remediation, and who has authority over the facility and IT resources needed to sustain them.

Requirement and evidence

The accountable executive shall appoint, for each Capability Instance, one capability owner with documented authority over the Service Outcomes, impact tolerances, risk acceptance within delegated limits, and the commitment of facility, platform and provider resources needed to meet them. The capability owner shall be identified in the capability register, the RACI and the decision-rights matrix, and a deputy shall be named for EMERGENCY and RECOVERY states.

Evidence required: E1 Documentary and declarative; E6 Human and experiential. Optional: E2. Operating states: NORMAL, EMERGENCY, RECOVERY.

MCF-CAP-003 Lifecycle Status

Claim operationAssurance level AL4Tier CP-3Evidence floor S4Supports CG-01, CG-14

Objective. Ensure that each Capability Instance's lifecycle status (planned, in design, in build, commissioning, in service, degraded-service, in change, retiring, retired) is accurate at all times so that the claim type, evidence and gates applied match the instance's real stage.

Requirement and evidence

The capability owner shall define lifecycle status values and transition criteria for Capability Instances, shall record each status transition with date, approver and the evidence that the transition criteria were met, and shall not transition an instance to in-service until commissioning acceptance (MCF-CAP-022) is recorded. The assurance programme lead shall use the recorded status to select claim types and Assurance Levels for each assessment.

Evidence required: E1 Documentary and declarative; E3 Operational and observational. Optional: E2, E7. Operating states: NORMAL, TRANSITION.

MCF-CAP-004 Architecture Linkage

Claim implementationAssurance level AL3Tier CP-2Evidence floor S3Critical to CG-02Supports CG-03, CG-01

Objective. Ensure that each Capability Instance is linked to a current ArchitectureSnapshot that identifies the InfrastructureSystems, AssetInstances and Interfaces implementing its Required Functions (power, cooling, compute, storage, network, control plane), so that the assessment boundary is grounded in the real architecture.

Requirement and evidence

The capability architect shall maintain, for each Capability Instance, a current ArchitectureSnapshot linked in the assurance graph that identifies the Required Functions of each Service Outcome and the InfrastructureSystems, AssetInstances and Interfaces implementing them, including shared and external elements. The capability architect shall version the snapshot after every material change and shall reconcile it to as-built and as-configured evidence at no more than the architecture reconciliation interval.

Evidence required: E1 Documentary and declarative; E2 Configuration and technical state; E7 Derived and analytical. Optional: E6, E3. Operating states: NORMAL.

CAP-02 Service outcome definition

MCF-CAP-005 Availability Outcomes

Claim designAssurance level AL2Tier CP-1Evidence floor S3Critical to CG-01

Objective. Define availability Service Outcomes for each Capability Instance in units that reflect AI work actually delivered (for example usable accelerator capacity, job-serving availability), with measurement window, exclusions and tolerance, so that power, cooling and platform continuity can be assessed against a stated target.

Requirement and evidence

The capability owner shall approve, for each Capability Instance, availability Service Outcomes that state the unit of availability (for example fraction of committed accelerators schedulable and healthy, or fraction of inference requests served), the target, the measurement window, the maximum single-interruption duration, permitted exclusions (for example planned maintenance) and the data source for measurement. The capability owner shall ensure the outcomes are consistent with customer commitments (MCF-GOV-019) and impact tolerances (MCF-CAP-010).

Evidence required: E1 Documentary and declarative; E7 Derived and analytical. Optional: E3, E6. Operating states: NORMAL, MAINTENANCE, DEGRADED.

MCF-CAP-006 Performance Outcomes

Claim designAssurance level AL2Tier CP-1Evidence floor S3Critical to CG-01Supports CG-08

Objective. Define performance Service Outcomes that capture whether the infrastructure lets AI work run at its required speed (for example training goodput, step-time stability, inference latency percentiles, collective bandwidth), so that throttling, fabric congestion or storage stalls are visible as outcome failures rather than hidden behind availability.

Requirement and evidence

The capability owner shall approve, for each Capability Instance, performance Service Outcomes that state the metric (for example training goodput fraction, median and tail step time, inference latency at a stated percentile, sustained accelerator power without thermal or power throttling), target, measurement method, measurement window, workload or benchmark reference, and the infrastructure conditions under which the target applies. The AI platform owner shall ensure the measurement method is implemented and its data retained.

Evidence required: E1 Documentary and declarative; E7 Derived and analytical. Optional: E3, E4. Operating states: NORMAL, DEGRADED.

MCF-CAP-007 Integrity Outcomes

Claim designAssurance level AL2Tier CP-1Evidence floor S3Critical to CG-01Supports CG-08

Objective. Define integrity Service Outcomes for model weights, checkpoints, training data and inference results so that silent data corruption, partial writes and configuration drift are treated as outcome failures with stated tolerances and detection expectations.

Requirement and evidence

The capability owner shall approve, for each Capability Instance, integrity Service Outcomes stating which data and states are protected (model weights, optimiser state, checkpoints, datasets, configuration), the integrity property required (no undetected corruption, verified completeness, version provenance), the detection mechanism expected (checksums, end-to-end verification, accelerator error reporting), the tolerated detection latency and the required response. The data platform owner shall confirm that each detection mechanism exists.

Evidence required: E1 Documentary and declarative; E2 Configuration and technical state. Optional: E7, E6. Operating states: NORMAL, RECOVERY.

MCF-CAP-008 Recovery Outcomes

Claim designAssurance level AL2Tier CP-1Evidence floor S3Critical to CG-01Supports CG-10

Objective. Define recovery Service Outcomes for each Capability Instance (time to restore stated capacity, tolerated loss of training progress, restoration order, recovered-state verification) so that power, cooling, compute, storage, network and control-plane recovery can be assessed against a stated target.

Requirement and evidence

The capability owner shall approve, for each Capability Instance, recovery Service Outcomes that state the recovery time objective for restoring a stated fraction of capacity, the recovery point objective (for training expressed as maximum lost training time, driving checkpoint interval; for inference as maximum state or configuration loss), the restoration order of dependent services (facility power, cooling, control plane, storage, fabric, compute, scheduler), and the verification required before declaring recovery. The capability owner shall ensure these outcomes are consistent with impact tolerances and customer commitments.

Evidence required: E1 Documentary and declarative; E2 Configuration and technical state. Optional: E7, E4. Operating states: RECOVERY, FAILED, EMERGENCY.

CAP-03 Criticality and materiality

MCF-CAP-009 Criticality Criteria

Claim designAssurance level AL2Tier CP-1Evidence floor S3Supports CG-01

Objective. Establish approved criteria for classifying Capability Instances, Service Outcomes and Required Functions by criticality, so that assurance depth, evidence floors, gate applicability and remediation priority follow consequence consistently.

Requirement and evidence

The accountable executive shall approve criticality criteria that classify Capability Instances, Service Outcomes and Required Functions into defined classes using stated consequence dimensions (safety, customer and contractual, financial, regulatory, reputational, societal dependency) and thresholds. The capability owner shall apply the criteria to every in-scope item, record the class and rationale, and re-apply them after every material change.

Evidence required: E1 Documentary and declarative; E7 Derived and analytical. Optional: E6. Operating states: NORMAL.

MCF-CAP-010 Impact Tolerance

Claim designAssurance level AL2Tier CP-1Evidence floor S3Critical to CG-01

Objective. Set approved, measurable impact tolerances for each Service Outcome (maximum tolerable interruption, capacity reduction, lost work and integrity loss) that define the limit beyond which harm is unacceptable, and against which gates and decisions are evaluated.

Requirement and evidence

The capability owner shall set, and the accountable executive shall approve, for each Service Outcome of each Capability Instance, impact tolerances stating maximum tolerable interruption duration, maximum tolerable capacity reduction and its duration, maximum tolerable loss of work (for example training progress), and tolerated integrity loss, each with units and the operating states to which it applies. Tolerances shall lie within risk appetite limits (MCF-GOV-014) or have governing-body approval of the exceedance.

Evidence required: E1 Documentary and declarative; E7 Derived and analytical. Optional: E6. Operating states: NORMAL, DEGRADED, EMERGENCY, RECOVERY.

MCF-CAP-011 Stakeholder Consequence

Claim designAssurance level AL2Tier CP-1Evidence floor S3Supports CG-01

Objective. Identify who is harmed, and how, when each Service Outcome is not met (internal research teams, external tenants, downstream services relying on inference, safety-relevant users), so that criticality and tolerances reflect real consequence chains.

Requirement and evidence

The capability owner shall record, for each Service Outcome, the stakeholder groups affected by its failure, the consequence mechanism (for example lost training progress, failed inference for a dependent service, breach of a regulatory obligation), the consequence severity under each operating state and any downstream dependency outside the boundary. The capability owner shall review the analysis with representatives of affected stakeholder groups at least once per planning period.

Evidence required: E1 Documentary and declarative; E6 Human and experiential. Optional: E7. Operating states: NORMAL, DEGRADED, FAILED.

MCF-CAP-012 Priority Classification

Claim implementationAssurance level AL3Tier CP-2Evidence floor S3Supports CG-05, CG-06

Objective. Ensure that the relative priority of workloads, tenants and Capability Instances is defined and implemented in the mechanisms that allocate scarce resources during degradation (power capping, load shedding, thermal curtailment, scheduler pre-emption), so that the most critical outcomes are protected first.

Requirement and evidence

The capability owner shall define priority classes for workloads, tenants and Capability Instances derived from criticality, and the AI platform owner and facility operator shall implement those classes in scheduler pre-emption policies, power-capping and load-shedding sequences and thermal curtailment procedures. The capability owner shall confirm at the priority reconciliation interval that implemented sequences match the defined classes.

Evidence required: E1 Documentary and declarative; E2 Configuration and technical state. Optional: E3, E4. Operating states: NORMAL, DEGRADED, EMERGENCY.

CAP-04 Demand and growth modelling

MCF-CAP-013 Current Demand Baseline

Claim operationAssurance level AL4Tier CP-3Evidence floor S4Supports CG-05, CG-06

Objective. Establish a measured baseline of the current IT, cooling and network demand of each Capability Instance (electrical load per pod and hall, heat rejected to air and liquid, facility water flow, fabric utilisation, storage throughput) from telemetry over a representative period, so that capacity and headroom claims rest on measurement rather than nameplate.

Requirement and evidence

The capacity manager shall establish, for each Capability Instance, a demand baseline derived from telemetry over at least the baseline period, covering electrical demand at rack, row, pod and hall level, heat load to air and to liquid, facility water flow and temperatures, and fabric and storage utilisation. The capacity manager shall state telemetry sources, resolution, gaps and calibration status, and refresh the baseline at the baseline refresh interval and after material change.

Evidence required: E2 Configuration and technical state; E3 Operational and observational; E7 Derived and analytical. Optional: E1. Operating states: NORMAL, MAINTENANCE.

MCF-CAP-014 Peak and Transient Demand

Claim operationAssurance level AL4Tier CP-3Evidence floor S4Supports CG-05, CG-06

Objective. Characterise the peak and fast-transient demand of AI workloads (synchronous training power swings at iteration and checkpoint boundaries, job start and stop steps, inrush on restart, rapid heat-load changes on liquid loops) so that UPS, generation, grid connection, protection and cooling control are sized and tuned for real dynamics.

Requirement and evidence

The capacity manager, with the electrical and mechanical leads, shall characterise for each Capability Instance the peak demand and the transient demand profile, stating the maximum step change, ramp rate and repetition frequency of electrical load and heat load, measured at a resolution sufficient to resolve the transients, under representative workloads including job start, synchronous training, checkpointing and job failure. The capacity manager shall provide the characterisation to the POW and THM design owners and to the grid connection owner, and refresh it after any change in accelerator generation, workload type or power-management configuration.

Evidence required: E2 Configuration and technical state; E3 Operational and observational; E7 Derived and analytical. Optional: E4, E1. Operating states: NORMAL, TRANSITION, RECOVERY.

MCF-CAP-015 Growth Forecast

Claim designAssurance level AL2Tier CP-1Evidence floor S3

Objective. Forecast demand growth for each Capability Instance (accelerator count, power per accelerator, rack density, liquid-cooled fraction, fabric scale, storage capacity and throughput) over the planning horizon so that power, cooling, space and supply-chain lead times are committed before demand arrives.

Requirement and evidence

The capacity manager shall maintain a growth forecast for each Capability Instance over the planning horizon stating expected accelerator deployments by generation, power per accelerator and rack, liquid-cooled fraction, fabric and storage scale, with the assumptions and their sources, an uncertainty range, and the date by which each infrastructure commitment must be made given supplier and utility lead times. The capability owner shall approve the forecast and review it against actuals at the forecast review interval.

Evidence required: E1 Documentary and declarative; E7 Derived and analytical. Optional: E3, E6. Operating states: NORMAL.

MCF-CAP-016 Scenario Demand

Claim resilienceAssurance level AL5Tier CP-5Evidence floor S5Supports CG-10, CG-05

Objective. Characterise demand under adverse and recovery scenarios (simultaneous restart after power loss, checkpoint-restore storage bursts, failover of load to surviving halls, cooling recovery with high residual heat) and validate it in exercise, so that recovery does not itself overload power, cooling, fabric or storage.

Requirement and evidence

The capacity manager, with the resilience lead, shall model for each Capability Instance the demand on power, cooling, fabric and storage during the declared recovery and failover scenarios (including restart inrush, checkpoint-restore read bursts, re-scheduling storms and transfer of load to surviving fault domains), shall define the staging that keeps demand within supply during recovery, and shall validate the model and staging in at least one recovery exercise per exercise interval.

Evidence required: E1 Documentary and declarative; E3 Operational and observational; E4 Validation and test; E7 Derived and analytical. Optional: E2, E5. Operating states: RECOVERY, TRANSITION, DEGRADED.

CAP-05 Operating envelope

MCF-CAP-017 Load Envelope

Claim implementationAssurance level AL3Tier CP-2Evidence floor S3Supports CG-05, CG-06

Objective. Define and enforce the electrical and thermal load envelope of each Capability Instance (maximum IT load per rack, row, pod and hall; maximum liquid heat load per CDU loop; power per accelerator) and ensure mechanisms prevent load from exceeding it.

Requirement and evidence

The capability architect shall define, for each Capability Instance, the load envelope: maximum IT power per rack, row, pod and hall, maximum heat load per CDU or liquid loop, and permitted power per accelerator, each derived from the lowest-rated element in the power and cooling path in the declared redundancy state. The AI platform owner and facility operator shall implement enforcement (power capping, admission control for new racks or jobs, alarm thresholds) and shall verify that configured limits equal the envelope.

Evidence required: E1 Documentary and declarative; E2 Configuration and technical state. Optional: E3, E7. Operating states: NORMAL, DEGRADED, MAINTENANCE.

MCF-CAP-018 Environmental Envelope

Claim implementationAssurance level AL3Tier CP-2Evidence floor S3Supports CG-06

Objective. Define the environmental envelope the AI equipment requires (air inlet temperature and humidity, facility water and technology cooling system supply temperature, flow and pressure, coolant quality) by reference to OEM specifications and recognised thermal guidelines, and ensure setpoints and alarms enforce it.

Requirement and evidence

The capability architect shall define, for each Capability Instance, the environmental envelope covering air inlet temperature and humidity, technology cooling system and facility water supply temperature, minimum flow and differential pressure, and coolant quality, derived from accelerator and server OEM specifications and the applicable ASHRAE TC 9.9 classes. The facility operator shall configure BMS and CDU setpoints and alarm thresholds within the envelope and shall reconcile them to the envelope after every OEM specification revision.

Evidence required: E1 Documentary and declarative; E2 Configuration and technical state. Optional: E3. Operating states: NORMAL, DEGRADED.

MCF-CAP-019 Duration Limits

Claim effectivenessAssurance level AL5Tier CP-4Evidence floor S4Supports CG-05, CG-06, CG-10

Objective. Establish and validate how long each Capability Instance can sustain its outcomes in each degraded condition (UPS autonomy at actual load, thermal ride-through of liquid loops and rooms on loss of cooling, fuel autonomy, time on reduced redundancy) so that response and recovery actions are timed within real limits.

Requirement and evidence

The capability architect shall state, for each Capability Instance, duration limits for each declared degraded condition: battery autonomy at measured load, thermal ride-through time before equipment limits are reached on loss of chilled or facility water, generator fuel autonomy, and maximum time on reduced redundancy. The facility operator shall validate each limit by test, measurement or validated model at the duration validation interval and after material change, and shall align alarms and runbooks to the validated limits.

Evidence required: E2 Configuration and technical state; E3 Operational and observational; E4 Validation and test. Optional: E1, E5, E7. Operating states: DEGRADED, EMERGENCY, MAINTENANCE.

MCF-CAP-020 State-Specific Limits

Claim operationAssurance level AL4Tier CP-3Evidence floor S4Supports CG-09, CG-10

Objective. Define and enforce limits that apply only in non-normal operating states (maintenance with reduced redundancy, degraded cooling, emergency, recovery, transition) so that permitted load, activities and changes are restricted when margins are smaller.

Requirement and evidence

The capability architect shall define for each Capability Instance the limits applying in each non-normal operating state, including maximum permitted IT load, prohibited activities (for example concurrent maintenance on both power paths, firmware rollouts, large job starts), required approvals and maximum duration. The facility operator and AI platform owner shall implement these limits in maintenance permits, change freezes, scheduler policies and power-capping profiles, and shall record state entry and exit.

Evidence required: E1 Documentary and declarative; E2 Configuration and technical state; E3 Operational and observational. Optional: E6. Operating states: MAINTENANCE, DEGRADED, EMERGENCY, RECOVERY, TRANSITION.

CAP-06 Capability lifecycle and change

MCF-CAP-021 Design-to-Operation Traceability

Claim implementationAssurance level AL3Tier CP-2Evidence floor S3Supports CG-02

Objective. Ensure that design intent (Service Outcomes, envelopes, redundancy, fault domains) is traceable through build and commissioning into the operating configuration, so that differences between designed, installed, commissioned and operated states are visible.

Requirement and evidence

The capability architect shall maintain traceability from each Service Outcome and envelope to design requirements, to as-built records, to commissioning results and to the current operating configuration for each Capability Instance, recording deviations at each stage with disposition. The facility operator and AI platform owner shall provide current configuration evidence for reconciliation at the traceability reconciliation interval.

Evidence required: E1 Documentary and declarative; E2 Configuration and technical state; E4 Validation and test. Optional: E7. Operating states: NORMAL.

MCF-CAP-022 Commissioning Acceptance

Claim effectivenessAssurance level AL5Tier CP-4Evidence floor S4Supports CG-02, CG-08, CG-14

Objective. Ensure that a Capability Instance, or an expansion of it, is accepted into service only after integrated commissioning demonstrates that the combined power, cooling, control, compute, storage and network systems deliver the Service Outcomes under normal and declared degraded conditions.

Requirement and evidence

The commissioning manager shall plan and execute integrated systems testing for each new or expanded Capability Instance that exercises power, cooling, control systems, compute, storage and fabric together at representative load, including declared failure transfers (for example loss of a UPS module, CDU pump failover, loss of a fabric link) and their effect on Service Outcomes. The capability owner shall sign acceptance only when acceptance criteria tied to Service Outcomes are met or deviations are dispositioned, and shall record the accepted configuration baseline.

Evidence required: E1 Documentary and declarative; E2 Configuration and technical state; E3 Operational and observational; E4 Validation and test. Optional: E5. Operating states: NORMAL, DEGRADED, TRANSITION.

MCF-CAP-023 Material Change Impact

Claim operationAssurance level AL4Tier CP-3Evidence floor S4Critical to CG-14Supports CG-01

Objective. Ensure that every proposed change that could affect a Capability Instance's Service Outcomes, envelopes, fault domains or dependencies (accelerator refresh, density increase, cooling conversion, fabric expansion, provider change) is assessed for capability impact, validated after implementation and used to trigger reassessment.

Requirement and evidence

The capability owner shall ensure that every change classified as material for a Capability Instance has a capability impact assessment before approval that identifies affected Service Outcomes, envelopes, fault domains, dependencies, controls, gates and evidence; defines post-change validation; and identifies assurance claims to be suspended or reassessed. The change authority shall not approve a material change without the impact assessment, and the capability owner shall confirm post-change validation before the change is closed.

Evidence required: E1 Documentary and declarative; E2 Configuration and technical state; E3 Operational and observational. Optional: E4, E7. Operating states: NORMAL, TRANSITION, MAINTENANCE.

MCF-CAP-024 Retirement Control

Claim implementationAssurance level AL3Tier CP-2Evidence floor S3Supports CG-14, CG-02, CG-04

Objective. Ensure that retiring all or part of a Capability Instance (decommissioning racks, draining liquid loops, removing storage, ending a provider service) is controlled so that remaining outcomes, data protection and safety are not compromised and records are updated.

Requirement and evidence

The capability owner shall approve a retirement plan for each retirement of capability or infrastructure that identifies remaining Service Outcomes affected, dependencies to be removed or transferred, data sanitisation of storage media and accelerator memory, safe isolation and draining of liquid loops and disposal of batteries and coolant, and updates to the capability register, architecture snapshot and assurance graph. The facility operator shall confirm completion of each step with evidence.

Evidence required: E1 Documentary and declarative; E2 Configuration and technical state; E3 Operational and observational. Optional: E5. Operating states: SHUTDOWN, TRANSITION.

Source: controls.csv, evidence-profiles.csv and gate-mappings.csv.