MCF-THM-001 Heat-Load Model
Claim designAssurance level AL2Tier CP-1Evidence floor S3Supports CG-06, CG-01
Objective. Establish an authoritative, versioned model of the heat that each fault domain must reject, split by heat-removal path (air, direct-to-chip liquid, rear-door, immersion), so that every downstream capacity, redundancy and recovery claim is tested against a defensible demand figure rather than nameplate or average IT power.
Requirement and evidence
The thermal engineering authority shall maintain a versioned heat-load model for each Capability Instance that states, per hall, row, rack group and CDU or air-handling fault domain, the design and peak heat load in kW, the liquid-capture ratio by platform, residual heat to air, and the transient load profile of synchronous AI training. The facility owner shall approve the model and shall not accept capacity claims that are not traceable to the current model version.
Evidence required: E1 Documentary and declarative; E7 Derived and analytical. Optional: E5, E6. Operating states: NORMAL, TRANSITION.
MCF-THM-002 Design Capacity
Claim implementationAssurance level AL3Tier CP-5Evidence floor S5Critical to CG-06Supports CG-02
Objective. Demonstrate that the installed and commissioned capacity of every stage of the heat-removal path (air, TCS, CDU, FWS, heat rejection) meets the current heat-load model at design conditions, so that the facility can actually remove the heat it is declared to support.
Requirement and evidence
The thermal engineering authority shall demonstrate, for each heat-removal stage and fault domain, that commissioned capacity at design ambient and design supply temperatures is not less than the design heat load from MCF-THM-001 plus the approved margin. The facility operator shall hold the commissioning records and shall not admit IT load beyond the demonstrated capacity of the weakest stage in the path.
Evidence required: E1 Documentary and declarative; E2 Configuration and technical state; E3 Operational and observational; E4 Validation and test. Optional: E5. Operating states: NORMAL, TRANSITION.
MCF-THM-003 Resilient Capacity
Claim resilienceAssurance level AL5Tier CP-5Evidence floor S5Critical to CG-06Supports CG-09, CG-05
Objective. Ensure heat removal remains within the IT inlet and coolant envelopes when any single credible component, path or controller is lost, during maintenance, and through power-event transients (utility loss, UPS transfer, generator start, chiller restart).
Requirement and evidence
The thermal engineering authority shall define the declared redundancy (for example N+1, 2N) for each heat-removal stage and shall demonstrate that, with the largest single unit or path out of service, capacity meets design load. The facility owner shall demonstrate thermal ride-through: that pumps, CDUs and controls needed to keep coolant moving are on continuous power, and that thermal storage or ride-through margin keeps TCS supply and IT inlet temperatures within limits until chillers or heat rejection restart.
Evidence required: E1 Documentary and declarative; E2 Configuration and technical state; E3 Operational and observational; E4 Validation and test. Optional: E5, E7. Operating states: NORMAL, DEGRADED, MAINTENANCE, EMERGENCY, TRANSITION, RECOVERY.
MCF-THM-004 Seasonal Derating
Claim operationAssurance level AL4Tier CP-5Evidence floor S5Critical to CG-06Supports CG-03
Objective. Ensure heat-rejection and economiser capacity is rated at the site's extreme design ambient conditions, including projected climate change, so that capacity claims hold through heatwaves and high wet-bulb periods.
Requirement and evidence
The thermal engineering authority shall define design ambient dry-bulb and wet-bulb conditions from a stated climatic data source and return period, shall derate chillers, dry coolers and cooling towers to those conditions, and shall review the derating annually against observed extremes. The facility operator shall monitor available heat-rejection capacity against load during high-ambient periods and shall invoke load-management procedures before capacity is exceeded.
Evidence required: E2 Configuration and technical state; E3 Operational and observational; E7 Derived and analytical. Optional: E1, E6. Operating states: NORMAL, DEGRADED, EMERGENCY.